I have another confession to make: I suffer from an incurable case of logomisia. This disorder comes from the Greek for "word hatred" and describes a strong dislike for a word or phrase based on its sound or usage. Right now, my logomisia is in full bloom with a word used on many news networks, but in almost no westerns. You are absolutely correct in assuming that word is, in fact, "absolutely."
Shepherd Smith (to reporter on the ground): "So, would you say the situation in Syria has become so confusing we no longer have any idea of what we are talking about?"
Reporter: "Absolutely, Shep."
In
the English language, "Absolutely" is a linguistic trick referred to as
an intensifier. Every language needs a few of these to be reserved for
use on special occasions. However, this particular term has been so
brutally overworked in contemporary culture that it probably deserves
our sympathy. It certainly merits retirement from the news networks.
The
word "absolutely" has replaced "yes" as the most common way of
expressing affirmation in English - and not just on U.S. television news
programs. Have you ever heard Prime Minister David Cameron's overuse of
the word "absolutely"? If you pay attention you can hear it three or
four times within a few sentences. Some experts compare the word
“absolutely” to a “verbal virus,” saying it’s spreading fast and
unchecked in just about every breaking news report you find on TV, radio
or in print. I would go even farther and say it has become a type of
verbal tic, something used to sound authoritative even when the speaker
has no idea of what he is talking about.
Some
language experts trace the word’s current popularity back to 1994.
During his murder trial O.J. Simpson declared he was: “Absolutely,100%
not guilty.” Of course, all of us believed that statement! Still, today
people use it to add credence to what they are saying when their
statements are basically content free.
I
find the word to be especially distressing because most of the
journalists employing the term wouldn't know an absolute if it crept up
and bit them on the arm. Today, people and cultures develop their own
definition of what is right or wrong. This type of moral relativity is
unacceptable because it implies an act can be right for Bashar Hafez
al-Assad, the President of Syria, even when it is cruel, hateful or
harmful.
Relative
truth is something which is only true at one time and at one place. It
is true now, but it may not have been true in the past. It is true for
some people, but not, necessarily true for others. It is subject to
people's perspectives and can always be changed pragmatically.
This
is not a new concept. It was the Greek philosopher Protagoras who said,
"Man is the measure of all things." What is morally right for me, may
be wrong for another. Each person can decide their own standard for
right and wrong living.
You
have to admire the chutzpah of someone whose worldview is built on the
concept of relative truth actually saying "absolutely" in public -
especially on a network as reputable as the BBC!
Christians
have been known for believing that something which is true at one time
is true at all times. Truth is true whether we believe it or not. Truth
is discovered or it is revealed - it is not invented by men, even
religious men. We may learn to apply truth in different ways, but that
does not change the essential character of truth.
You
will never have a stick with one end. Time goes forward, not backward.
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States. He can
never be the 20th, or the 14th. People who use the word "absolutely"
should actually believe in a few absolutes.
Thinking
of Mr. Lincoln, he once said, "Be sure to put your feet in the right
place, then stand firm." There is a lot to be said for that truth. I
have a feeling even singing cowboys like Roy Rogers, would have said,
"Absolutely, Mr. President. Absolutely."
No comments:
Post a Comment